Current Profile Validation Summary

TUFLOW-FV Model (CSIEM-1.7.0) vs ADCP / AWAC observations — Cockburn Sound & surrounds, Western Australia

← Back to Chapter 9: Hydrodynamics
WWMSP ADCP (2021–2022)
JPPL AWAC (2013)
ADV Owen Anchorage (2023)

ADCP Mooring Sites

CS1 20m CS2 20m CS3 20m CS4 11m CS5 11m CS6 11m CS7 6m

Cockburn Sound, Western Australia
Sites span 6–20 m depth

ADCP Data Window Coverage

42 site–window combinations assessed across 8 windows.

WindowPeriodDays CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4 CS5 CS6 CS7
W0
Autumn Transition
2021-04-16 – 2021-06-1055
W1
Summer Sea-Breeze
2021-11-22 – 2021-12-0614
W2
Northerly then Sea-Breeze
2021-12-06 – 2021-12-1812
W3
Late Summer
2022-02-01 – 2022-02-1514
W4
Easterly Component
2022-02-15 – 2022-03-0114
W5
Post-Cyclone CSW
2022-03-22 – 2022-04-0716
W6
Storm-Driven Renewal
2022-06-15 – 2022-06-2914
W7
Leeuwin Current
2022-06-29 – 2022-07-1314
W02021-04-16 – 2021-06-10
W12021-11-22 – 2021-12-06
W22021-12-06 – 2021-12-18
W32022-02-01 – 2022-02-15
W42022-02-15 – 2022-03-01
W52022-03-22 – 2022-04-07
W62022-06-15 – 2022-06-29
W72022-06-29 – 2022-07-13
W0 Residual Circulation
W0: Autumn Transition
  • Autumn transition: progressive cooling 22 °C → 18 °C with intermittent calm periods
  • SW wind events (12–14 m/s) punctuate calm spells, driving rapid full-depth mixing
  • Shift from light easterlies toward winter wind regime
  • Baseline test at two deep basin sites (CS2, CS3) during seasonal transition
Model notes: Uses 2021B simulation (separate year to W1–W7). Model reproduces stratification–destratification cycles during intermittent calm/wind periods. DWER profiling mooring comparisons confirm model slightly overestimates upper-column temperature; timing of cooling events well captured. CS3 persistent directional offset in lower water column already apparent.

CS6 not available

CS2
CS2 (20m) — Basin (mid-west)

CS4 not available

CS7 not available

CS3
CS3 (20m) — Basin (south)
W1 Residual Circulation
W1: Summer Sea-Breeze
  • Established diurnal sea-breeze pattern; S/SW winds dominate (69%), 8–12 m/s afternoons
  • Regular two-layer flow: wind-driven northward surface over southward bottom return
  • Model captures phasing and depth of velocity reversal with good fidelity
  • Purest sea-breeze forcing window of the campaign
Model notes: Good fidelity in diurnal reversal phasing and depth of velocity shear at all sites. Near-bottom observed speeds occasionally exceed model during strongest sea-breeze events. CS3 shows persistent directional offset in lower water column. CS6 (Owen Anchorage) observed directional variability broader than modelled — local reef/coastal geometry effects not fully resolved by mesh.
CS6
CS6 (11m) — Owen Anchorage

CS1 not available

CS5
CS5 (11m) — Shelf (north)
CS2
CS2 (20m) — Basin (mid-west)
CS4
CS4 (11m) — Shelf (south)

CS7 not available

CS3
CS3 (20m) — Basin (south)
W2 Residual Circulation
W2: Northerly then Sea-Breeze
  • S/SW dominates (52%) with single 26-hour northerly event (~9 Dec)
  • CS7 (Causeway) site comes online — strong tidal signal through the constriction
  • Diurnal current reversals continue; model maintains good speed and reversal agreement
  • Broadens validation to include Garden Island Causeway exchange
Model notes: CS7 (Causeway) tidal phasing well captured by model; +96° compass correction applied to EcoADCP aligns observed directions with model’s along-channel flow axis. CS3 directional offset persists, confirming systematic feature. CS4 and CS5 records end mid-window (instruments recovered ~10–13 Dec).
CS6
CS6 (11m) — Owen Anchorage

CS1 not available

CS5
CS5 (11m) — Shelf (north)
CS2
CS2 (20m) — Basin (mid-west)
CS4
CS4 (11m) — Shelf (south)
CS7
CS7 (6m) — Causeway
CS3
CS3 (20m) — Basin (south)
W3 Residual Circulation
W3: Late Summer
  • S/SW still dominant (53%) but diurnal cycle less regular; brief NE interruptions
  • Full 7-site coverage enables assessment of anti-clockwise bottom gyre structure
  • Model captures directional shifts during NE events; some surface speed underestimation
  • Persistent directional offset at CS3 (southern basin)
Model notes: Most spatially complete window (all 7 sites). Model captures timing of directional shifts during brief NE events but near-surface speed intensification slightly exceeds modelled values. CS3 directional offset persists and model overestimates directional coherence at this site — suggests local bathymetric steering the B-mesh does not fully resolve. Bottom gyre vectors show anti-clockwise pattern consistent with D’Adamo summer regime.
CS6
CS6 (11m) — Owen Anchorage
CS1
CS1 (20m) — Basin (north)
CS5
CS5 (11m) — Shelf (north)
CS2
CS2 (20m) — Basin (mid-west)
CS4
CS4 (11m) — Shelf (south)
CS7
CS7 (6m) — Causeway
CS3
CS3 (20m) — Basin (south)
W4 Residual Circulation
W4: Easterly Component
  • S/SE/E winds dominate (72%); sea-breeze pattern persists with more E/SE component
  • Two-layer structure maintained with episodes of stronger near-surface intensification
  • Model captures overall pattern; slight underestimation of peak speeds
  • Comparison with W3 gyre pattern tests response to modified wind regime
Model notes: Episodes of stronger near-surface intensification (>0.25 m/s) at CS1 that model tends to underestimate — possibly modified wind fetch under easterly conditions. CS4 deployment ends mid-window (~20 Feb). Bottom gyre comparison with W3 tests whether residual pattern shifts under modified wind regime despite similar overall forcing — may indicate evolving basin–shelf density contrasts.
CS6
CS6 (11m) — Owen Anchorage
CS1
CS1 (20m) — Basin (north)
CS5
CS5 (11m) — Shelf (north)
CS2
CS2 (20m) — Basin (mid-west)
CS4
CS4 (11m) — Shelf (south)
CS7
CS7 (6m) — Causeway
CS3
CS3 (20m) — Basin (south)
W5 Residual Circulation
W5: Post-Cyclone CSW
  • TC Charlotte CSW: ~0.2–0.25 m sub-tidal peak arrives ~28 Mar
  • Winds predominantly E/SE (64%); barotropic pressure gradients drive enhanced exchange at CS1
  • Model captures CSW timing and amplitude via open boundary forcing
  • Depth-uniform flow on shallow shelf sites during weak local wind
Model notes: Open boundary forcing (WA-ROMS) successfully transmits CSW signal into the CSIEM domain. CS1 observed near-surface speeds slightly exceed model during strongest exchange events. CS3 persistent directional offset continues — bathymetric steering effect at southern basin not fully captured by B-mesh. CS4/CS5 barotropic response well reproduced; CS6 some directional discrepancies in lower water column.
CS6
CS6 (11m) — Owen Anchorage
CS1
CS1 (20m) — Basin (north)
CS5
CS5 (11m) — Shelf (north)

CS2 not available

CS4
CS4 (11m) — Shelf (south)

CS7 not available

CS3
CS3 (20m) — Basin (south)
W6 Residual Circulation
W6: Storm-Driven Renewal
  • Three sustained northerly episodes (33–47 h, 6–8 m/s); peak storm >15 m/s
  • Storm drives full-depth mixing; post-storm recovery shows re-establishment of two-layer flow
  • Deep-water renewal inflows detected at CS1 (northern opening)
  • First window to clearly sample D’Adamo winter–spring storm-driven renewal regime
Model notes: Model captures both storm intensification and post-storm recovery of vertical shear. Observed near-bottom speeds during calm aftermath suggest stronger deep renewal inflow than model produces at CS1. CS3 storm-driven bottom-intensified current pulses captured in timing but model vertical structure smoother than observed. CS6 shows different recovery pattern to basin sites — directional variability remains broad, reflecting open exposure to regional shelf processes.
CS6
CS6 (11m) — Owen Anchorage
CS1
CS1 (20m) — Basin (north)
CS5
CS5 (11m) — Shelf (north)

CS2 not available

CS4
CS4 (11m) — Shelf (south)

CS7 not available

CS3
CS3 (20m) — Basin (south)
W7 Residual Circulation
W7: Leeuwin Current
  • Peak Leeuwin Current influence; sustained elevated regional water levels
  • N/NE winds dominate (46%); persistent bottom-intensified baroclinic currents
  • Model captures elevated sub-tidal level and baroclinic exchange character
  • Contrast with W6 tests model’s shift from barotropic to baroclinic forcing
Model notes: Despite weak local wind, observed current field remains energetic — bottom-intensified currents at CS1 (~0.15–0.20 m/s) exceed modelled values during several multi-day episodes, suggesting model underestimates density-driven inflow under peak LC conditions. CS6 shows persistent southward flow consistent with regional LC influence; model captures general speed level but some directional timing differences. Shift from W6 (barotropic) to W7 (baroclinic) residual pattern provides stringent test of model forcing-mode transition.
CS6
CS6 (11m) — Owen Anchorage
CS1
CS1 (20m) — Basin (north)
CS5
CS5 (11m) — Shelf (north)

CS2 not available

CS4
CS4 (11m) — Shelf (south)

CS7 not available

CS3
CS3 (20m) — Basin (south)

Data Source & Notes

The ADCP current profile observations were collected as part of WAMSI Westport Marine Science Program, Project 5.1 (Multi-decadal ocean boundary conditions and field measurements), led by Prof Charitha Pattiaratchi and data curated by Tanziha Mahjabin, from the University of Western Australia (UWA). Seven bottom-mounted, upward-looking ADCPs were deployed across Cockburn Sound between April 2021 and August 2022, providing vertical current profiles at 0.15–0.50 m vertical resolution and 2–20 minute sampling intervals.

  • Out-of-water filtering — timesteps where pressure sensor depth < 1 m are masked.
  • Sidelobe contamination masking — cells above PSD × cos(beam_angle) set to NaN.
  • Speed threshold — current speeds exceeding 2.0 m/s are masked as physically implausible.
  • Timezone alignment — ADCP timestamps (UTC) shifted +8 h to AWST.
  • Vertical datum — metres relative to Australian Height Datum (mAHD).
  • CS7 Eco ADCP direction correction (+96°) — systematic compass offset applied to both Eco ADCP deployments.
  • CS7 Aquadopp HR excluded — June 2022 deployment has different offset and limited coverage.

Model: CSIEM1.7.0 — 2021B (W0) and 2022B (W1–W7) TUFLOW-FV runs. Speed colourmap fixed at 0–0.3 m/s. Direction uses the twilight_shifted cyclic colourmap (towards convention, °N).

AWAC Mooring Sites

S01 10m S02 18m

North of Cockburn Sound, Western Australia
S01 (~10 m) and S02 (~18 m)

AWAC Data Window Coverage

16 site–window combinations assessed across 8 windows.

WindowPeriodDays S01 S02
w1
Early Summer
2012-12-01 – 2013-01-1040
w2
Late Summer
2013-01-10 – 2013-02-1940
w3
Late Summer
2013-02-19 – 2013-03-0817
w4
Autumn
2013-03-10 – 2013-04-1839
w5
Late Autumn
2013-04-18 – 2013-05-2739
w6
Spring
2013-09-02 – 2013-10-1442
w7
Late Spring
2013-10-14 – 2013-11-2542
w8
Early Summer
2013-11-25 – 2013-12-1722
w12012-12-01 – 2013-01-10
w22013-01-10 – 2013-02-19
w32013-02-19 – 2013-03-08
w42013-03-10 – 2013-04-18
w52013-04-18 – 2013-05-27
w62013-09-02 – 2013-10-14
w72013-10-14 – 2013-11-25
w82013-11-25 – 2013-12-17
w1 S01
S01 (10m) — Shallow (~10 m)
w1 S02
S02 (18m) — Deep (~18 m)
w2 S01
S01 (10m) — Shallow (~10 m)
w2 S02
S02 (18m) — Deep (~18 m)
w3 S01
S01 (10m) — Shallow (~10 m)
w3 S02
S02 (18m) — Deep (~18 m)
w4 S01
S01 (10m) — Shallow (~10 m)
w4 S02
S02 (18m) — Deep (~18 m)
w5 S01
S01 (10m) — Shallow (~10 m)
w5 S02
S02 (18m) — Deep (~18 m)
w6 S01
S01 (10m) — Shallow (~10 m)
w6 S02
S02 (18m) — Deep (~18 m)
w7 S01
S01 (10m) — Shallow (~10 m)
w7 S02
S02 (18m) — Deep (~18 m)
w8 S01
S01 (10m) — Shallow (~10 m)
w8 S02
S02 (18m) — Deep (~18 m)

Data Source & Notes

The AWAC (Acoustic Wave and Current) profiler data were collected by JPPL (James Point Pty Ltd) as part of a 2013 field campaign north of Cockburn Sound. Two bottom-mounted Nortek AWACs were deployed: S01 (shallow shelf, ~10 m depth, 15 vertical bins) and S02 (deeper basin, ~18 m depth, 25 bins). Deployments span December 2012 to December 2013, with data gaps at each site when instruments were serviced (S01 gap: Jun–Sep; S02 gap: May–Jul).

  • Source format — original MATLAB v7.3 / HDF5 files converted to NumPy .npz via convert_awac_mat.py (requires Python 3.12 with h5py).
  • Per-window coordinates — S02 was physically repositioned between sub-deployments; per-window coordinates are used for model cell extraction.
  • Speed colourmap — fixed at 0–0.3 m/s; direction uses twilight_shifted cyclic colourmap (towards convention, °N).

Model: CSIEM1.7.0 2013A (TUFLOW-FV, A-mesh) — Nov 2012 to Dec 2013.

ADV Deployment Sites

PBA 5m PBB 5m SBA 5m SBB 5m

Owen Anchorage & surrounds
Parmelia Bank & Success Bank (~5 m depth)

Deployment Windows

4 near-bed ADV sites deployed across 4 windows in 2023–2024 (WWMSP Project 9.1, Hansen et al. 2025).

WindowPeriodSeasonSites
d12023-02-18 – 2023-03-27Late SummerPBA, SBA
d22023-06-20 – 2023-08-08WinterPBA, SBA
d32023-09-01 – 2023-10-09SpringPBB, SBB
d42024-01-24 – 2024-02-22SummerPBB, SBB
d1 (Late Summer)2023-02-18
d2 (Winter)2023-06-20
d3 (Spring)2023-09-01
d4 (Summer)2024-01-24
PBB d4
PBB — Parmelia Bank B
SBB d4
SBB — Success Bank B

Data Source & Notes

Near-bed current velocity data were collected using Acoustic Doppler Velocimeters (ADVs) as part of WAMSI Westport Marine Science Program, Project 9.1 (In-situ hydrodynamic and sediment transport measurements; Hansen et al. 2025). Four ADVs were deployed across Parmelia Bank and Success Bank in Owen Anchorage during 2023–2024, measuring near-bed current velocities converted to speed and direction (towards).

  • 4-panel layout — Wind speed & direction, sub-tidal water level (Hillarys, Godin filter), current speed, current direction.
  • Measurement level — ADV sensors measure at a fixed height above the seabed (~0.15–0.5 m); model comparison uses bottom-layer velocities.
  • Speed filter — ADV speeds exceeding ±0.4 m/s are excluded; directions masked below 0.02 m/s.
  • Statistics — Pearson r and RMSE shown for speed; component-wise r and MAE for direction panel.
  • Sub-tidal panel — Not shown for d3/d4 as BOM Hillarys obs end 1 Jul 2023.

Model: CSIEM1.7.0 2023B TUFLOW-FV (B-mesh, 30 206 cells). Bottom-layer extraction via tfv.xarray.